1v1 Update - Jagex Reply

Discussion in 'Archives' started by Darkspirith, Feb 24, 2008.

1v1 Update - Jagex Reply
  1. Unread #1 - Feb 24, 2008 at 1:33 PM
  2. Darkspirith
    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2007
    Posts:
    1,742
    Referrals:
    2
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Darkspirith Guru
    Banned

    1v1 Update - Jagex Reply

    [​IMG]

    Real or Fake? You decide
     
  3. Unread #2 - Feb 24, 2008 at 1:36 PM
  4. yhsa2nd
    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2008
    Posts:
    98
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    yhsa2nd Member

    1v1 Update - Jagex Reply

    mehh... i beileve its real and then again i really dont....
    it would be cool though...
     
  5. Unread #3 - Feb 24, 2008 at 1:49 PM
  6. Darkspirith
    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2007
    Posts:
    1,742
    Referrals:
    2
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Darkspirith Guru
    Banned

    1v1 Update - Jagex Reply

    This is obviously fake.

    1) I highly doubt that Jagex would release privileged information just because they don't have any black marks.

    2) Jagex would not release marketing information.

    3) 1st paragraph 2nd line.. "...and the 'marketing strategy' we are using, do is fairly similar to the strategy you had described"
    ^do in that sentence makes no sense

    4) 2nd paragraph 3rd line.. 'Runescape'. It would be 'RuneScape'.

    5) 2nd paragraph.. "...was never going to come out and if it came out at all it would be terrible, and this is true"
    ^nothing true about the statement because they continue on to say players will like it, and also they say that it will be coming out.

    6) 2nd paragraph.. "You said that" it should be "You stated that" said = informal

    7) 2nd paragraph.. Theres 2 spaces between "that" and "Single-Zone"

    8 )Paragraph 3.. I doubt the 3 portal thing. It'll prob be like bh, 3 diff port's but they take care of the wealth thing as you go through, there shouldn't be a separate portal for that. Also doubt the exiting or not.

    9) 4th paragraph.. Jagex doesn't care about 'honorable' battles. That is why they allow rouges in bh and ect. Overheads is part of the game, they WOULD NOT take it out. It would be totally unfair to the people that have overheads.

    10) 5th paragraph.. "(Note if you die with non-tradables, we share the feeling with you that you shouldn't be able to lose them if they are non-tradable"
    ^sentence fragment. The item being non-tradable shouldn't have been mentioned twice.

    11) 5th paragraph.. 'tradables' isn't a word.

    12) 5th paragraph.. They never closed the parenthesis after saying "(Note"

    13) 5th paragraph.. They wouldn't let you keep your untradable items. You die you die.

    14) 5th paragraph.. Last word, mistyped. 'mini-fgame'

    15) 5th paragraph.. no punctuation after last word.

    I win ;)
     
  7. Unread #4 - Feb 24, 2008 at 1:55 PM
  8. Honeo
    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2005
    Posts:
    496
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Honeo Forum Addict

    1v1 Update - Jagex Reply

    If you knew it was fake then why did you post it? Lol.
     
  9. Unread #5 - Feb 24, 2008 at 1:56 PM
  10. poonmaster
    Referrals:
    0

    poonmaster Guest

    1v1 Update - Jagex Reply

    fake or not it still looks retarded, should have just kept the god damn wilderness
     
  11. Unread #6 - Feb 24, 2008 at 1:57 PM
  12. 1337Neo
    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2007
    Posts:
    1,337
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    1337Neo Guru
    Banned

    1v1 Update - Jagex Reply

    If it was messaged to You on the main site then I would belive it's real.

    If it was messaged by email fuck that. =P

    My guess for that is real.
     
  13. Unread #7 - Feb 24, 2008 at 1:59 PM
  14. Darkspirith
    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2007
    Posts:
    1,742
    Referrals:
    2
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Darkspirith Guru
    Banned

    1v1 Update - Jagex Reply

    I didn't, I'm just pointing out the flaws.
     
  15. Unread #8 - Feb 24, 2008 at 2:01 PM
  16. Dhaka2
    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Posts:
    301
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Dhaka2 Forum Addict
    Banned

    1v1 Update - Jagex Reply

    I believe it's real...

    Where can i submit query? sorry for going off topic:(
     
  17. Unread #9 - Feb 24, 2008 at 3:15 PM
  18. Dorito
    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2005
    Posts:
    1,520
    Referrals:
    1
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Dorito SCAMMER
    Banned

    1v1 Update - Jagex Reply

    The query is fake.

    First, the date of which it was sent was AFTER they removed the possibility to send in queries related to ingame issues. EVEN when you could send them in, you could NOT title a query.

    Second, you can't receive a query simply from "Jagex", it would have one of the many Jagex Mod's names on it.

    Last, there are countless spelling mistakes, punctuation errors, and spacing errors.

    This query is clearly not sent from Jagex.
     
  19. Unread #10 - Feb 24, 2008 at 6:49 PM
  20. bennytheberry
    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2007
    Posts:
    2,037
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    bennytheberry Grand Master
    Banned

    1v1 Update - Jagex Reply

    shouldnt this be under pictures?

    and hte only thing i saw was a typo and how a message like that would be from a j mod, not jagex (they qwere already pointed out though)
     
< How does PBP/SMS membership get billed?? | Randoms?????? >

Users viewing this thread
1 guest


 
 
Adblock breaks this site