Creation AND Evolution

Hm

DAMMMM

STOP WITH THE FUCKKING "WE HAVE PROOF FOR EVOLUTION"

NO YOU DON"T!!!

THEY ARE THEORIES!!!

ok? FIND ME A WEBSITE THAT SAYS ALL THE PROOFS TO EVOLUTION!

AnD I"LL FIND ONE THAT IS THE EXACT FUCKING OPPOSITE...

radioactive dating is unreliable too..
alot of things these days are based on what people think

What in the world makes 5...5?
What makes a Dollar bill worth.. 1$?

It's what the people think!!

FUK you could SOMEHOW get enough people to beleive that Pennies were worth 100$.. YOU FUkin could! probably not likely,.. but you see my point..

plus.. those of you who beleive in BIg Bang theory?

a giant explosion? that formed the earth?
or expansion? or w/e?

i heard molecules in the air combines and did some shit, and formed new elemetns
and then continued on to become a cell..
and then life happend.

where did those molecules come from?
answer A.____

then where did answer A come from ? Answer B___

then where did answer B____ come from? Answer C___

see wher i'm going ?

 

Evolution is real. Finding a website that says it isn't is not really a valid counter-argument. You are assuming that all websites are equal in terms of quality and content.

 

what makes you assume pro evolution resources are far greater in truth than counter evolution resources..
Do you have PROOF that 'pro' resources are > than 'counter' resources???

 

They're generally more logical, more in tune with what could be objectively considered to be true, etc.

If you want, we could argue the two concepts here.

 

the statement you just said about it being more logical..

it's logical to you...
you don't speak for the whole population
many others may think it illogical

 

They may think it, but that doesn't make it so.

Evolutionary logic is based upon the scientific method. If you accept the scientific method as logical (almost everybody does), then you must be arguing that the information was misinterpreted, or something along those lines. So, evolutionists and anti-evolutionists are both arguing using the same type of logic, they just disagree on the results.

 

see there you have it.... they all disagree.. no one knows the right defenite solid answer...
It can be expalined with our imagination, and theories...
but it will be something we will never be able to grasp , the knowledge is too great..

 

The vast majority of people dedicated to the natural sciences agree that evolution is true. The vast majority of those that disagree are religiously/politically motivated. There is no "real" disagreement.

We'll know, some day. We have so many brilliant minds working on it...

 

some believe (like my bio teacher) that god still exist's but he still believes in evolution.

he says that natural selection is "gods tool"

but somehow, you have to believe in evolution in my book.

 

Agreed, allthough to say you believe in evolution, earth of a reasonable age, etc and still call yourself a Christian is stretching it. Atleast around here you'll get called an athiest for that one, or be accused of blasphamy. Welcome to Alabama.

Continental drift, the general age of the universe, any advances in geology, biology, etc.

I was looking for the list of scietific topics I've used in the past and came across this. Very interesting. It's a lot and I'm still reading it. At the least read the examples given with each thing. I may make a thread for this topic alone.

http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/

edit: sorry I kinda got off point here.

 

yes, i believe you can have a happy medium, but i have/cannot find that happy place

i do believe in evolution, and until proven otherwise, always will


edit/

we watched a movie about the human eye

a cornea tear, how could a super natural being allow for something as delicate as they eyes to become something useless?

 

How could a loving, all-knowing, all-powerfull god let the human race end up like it is today?

 

thats what i ask also

 

hey!

you asked.. why does a super natural being (God) allow things such as cornea tears, and all the other negative things?


well think about it..

What would be the point of life, if EVERYTHING is controlled my God?
What Fun? is there?
A PERfect world? no fun eh?
just think carefluly about it.. don't just immediately say
"HELL YA . ! I WANT A PERFECt WORLD!"

think about hard experiences you've been through..
Christian or not.. its just the human life..
you learn how to handle stress and difficult situations.. you learn from your mistakes, and its just experience...

 

Heaven=perfect
perfect=boring?
enjoy =)

 

God would then probably start the universe, and allow it to progress on its own. But, hang on! If the universe is capable of progressing on its own, why is God necessary in the first place?

Yet, hold on a bit more. If God is all-knowing, then he knows exactly what is going to happen, meaning that you have no free will. If God limits his knowledge of the universe, then he is not all-knowing. Such contradictions!

 

What types of evolution would you say to be real?

Whose fault is it that the human race is what it is today? is it Gods fault? If so why is it His fault?

Why would I deny Continental Drift?

Who Decides the General Age of the Universe? What do they use to decide it?

Advances in Geology? name some.

Advances in Biology? name some.

Your telling me God can't exist because if you tear your cornea you become blind?

 

Darwinian.

If he's all-knowing, it's his fault.

Nobody decides it, it is objective. All we can do is measure it.

It's certainly not a perfect design.

 

Because He knows everything, everything bad that happens to anything, is His fault? what makes it His fault, other then because He has knowledge of it happening.

How Do I deny something objective?

What do we do to measure it?

If we were "perfect design", then there would be no point in challenging Evolution, because I doubt that anything that evolves is perfect.

 

If you design a machine to kill somebody, you are responsible for it.

You could use doublethink.

Radiometric dating, observing the rate of expansion of the universe, etc.

Note that all methods of radiometric dating (provided that they can be used over a long enough period) give almost identical answers as to the age of certain objects, etc.



If we were "perfect design", then there would be no point in challenging Evolution, because I doubt that anything that evolves is perfect.[/quote]