The Food You Eat

http://sythe.org/showthread.php?t=362889

@ x09, why not make the world into an synthetic food chain? could be better for everyone

 

its not natural just like cloning exc it should be the natural food chain mouse eats cheese cat eats mouse chinese guy takes in the cat then feeds it to americans americans die of food poisoning and get buiried to provide nutrition to grow grass which is eaten by cow who is milked and milk is turned to cheese(more advanced and different in a lot of ways but lol) no i was serious about natural chain

 

but wouldnt a synthetic food chain be more superior to the real one? consider all animals and plants would be free from harm from humans

 

but they need harm from humans for the natural system to stay in tact humans have been around as long as them acording to the bible and have always kept the animal and plant in tact if one or the others population got out of control

 

so should we have our own food chain and the animals and the plants just have their own food chain, because obveously the current food chain is wrong/flawed

 

whats so obvous that sticks out thats so wrong with the current one

 

its to cruel, we feast on plants and animals but none feast on us its not a circle

 

but god put us here and then put them here for us

 

thats a theroy and there is not physical evidance to support that

 

A THEORY IT is based on religion it is based on christianity it is in the bible

 

yes and the bible take its words, word for word directly from eqpytian scriptures.

thats fact

 

the bible has been around way before egyptians

 

If you're referring to the Christian bible, did the authors anticipate the birth of Jesus hundreds of years later when they wrote it? It would be amazing to write a first hand account of the events before they took place.

Please read what you're posting before you post it. It's a pain to read, and any improvements to spelling, punctuation, grammar, etc would help.

As are you. You should read both the site rules (no back seat modding) and that very same post (requiring contribution to the topic). You violated both, hippocrit. You are correct about his sentence structure, though.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Until people that are opposed to the consumption of meat stop bears, wolves, tigers, etc from eating it as well, they have no ground to stand on. They'll throw off the entire food chain (nothing to keep lower level populations in check except starvation) and will kill of those meat eaters (if they were meant to eat plants, they would), but hey, they'd be making that bunny they saved feel happy, right?

 

Eat or be eaten. Simple.

 

Life entails death. To survive, others must die. Of course, with modern science, we can change all of this. We can engineer specific proteins and carbohydrates, etc. However, this would basically be in pill/intravenous form, which ends up making people cranky.

 

but do you agree that there are flaws in our modern day food chain?

 

I suppose. The meat we eat isn't the healthiest.

 

so do you think seperating our current food chain into 2, one with humans and synthetic food and one between plants and animals would make most/all things flawed with our current food chain better?

 

I wouldn't think so. Synthetic food makes us miserable.

 

how so?