An interesting "proof" of God.

http://www.proofthatgodexists.org/

Discuss, debunk, etc.

 

Yes, real conclusive.

That site talks about absolute truth which is merely straight facts, laws of logic, math, and science, and claims thats proof.. LOL

They're are ironically, proof that there was no Intelligent design. Silly zealous Chirst fanboys and they're websites.

 

I was clicking the premise buttons, but then the website told me that gods are unprovable. The website is completely right.

 

that website didn't make much sense to me.. and i got redirected to the Disney site somehow -.-

 

No button for "I don't know what I know. If I knew, or even believed knowledge existed, I wouldn't be on this site."
So I was stuck on this page for a good 2 hours until my brain rebooted from a ping timeout.

But I humored the site and went on:

Correction: You would have no way to accurately predict

Humored again:

I appeal to the law of the land. Rape is wrong because it's illegal. In fact, I clicked "Molesting Children for fun could be right" button to get to that page. So why make the assumption I believe rape is wrong?
If God doesn't exist, morals cannot be absolute. So do you not need to prove God before getting to this?

After humoring again it was pointless since all assumption were predicated on the previous agreements. And if you didn't already believe in God, the points made would get you nowhere. I was lost from the very first question. GFG.
But don't worry, I'm searching Disney right now for some logical proof. I feel close!

 

Link won't work for me

 

Hmm I got to the morality page before my "journey" ended. No need to go on when you realize that there are no real "moral laws". I would have gone further to humor myself, but sadly, I have to got to school. I'm guessing that if you answer yes to all the questions they ask then that could be considered proof of a God, but I'm also guessing that there are more questions that are incorrect.

 

there are no real proofs of gods existence.. will never be. peeps just made it up to have something common and something to turn to when the bad times comes.

 

Irrelevant.

I personally believe that moral laws do not exist, this website is biased and could not simply such a huge debate in so few words

Code:

Do you believe that morals exist, (molesting children, rape are wrong)? 
> No
> You think molesting little kids is fun? 
> No
> Do you believe that morals exist, (molesting children, rape are wrong)? 
> Repeat...

I believe that morals are really just emotions disguised as reason, as the crocodile hides in the water, so do morals

 

It never said those, you have to read/think more carefully.
I asked if you believe absolute moral laws exist.
Then it asks if molesting children for fun could be right.
If you said no to that, then wouldn't the molestation of children be an absolute moral law? That's why it repeats.

 

either you believe in god or you dont the difference is that when you die you will go to heaven or you wont if you do believe in god like i do you will go to heaven

 

morals dont only concern molesting children though, I believe that molestation is wrong that doesn't make all morals wrong

 

?
Do you believe that it is possible for child molestation to not be wrong?
If not, then wouldn't that be an absolute moral? Therefore, you would believe absolute morals exist.

 

Morals, absolute?

What???

HA... Last time I checked, we don't think teenage pregancy is as bad as it used to be. But..... according to retard site, that would mean that God doesn't exist. Can someone explain that correlation?

 

Well... that's not exactly it. It doesn't matter what "we" think. If there was an absolute moral law concerning teenage pregnancy, then the fact that "our" views are changing just means we don't know of the law.
But the truth is that you need a being to create and govern such laws (else morals would be tangible). So it's a no-brainer, I feel, that you'd believe in God if you believe absolute moral laws exist.
If anything, absolute moral laws should be discussed after the "proving" of God... since some could believe that absolute moral laws still need not necessarily exist.

So his reasoning is wrong in many areas.

 

My head hurts. I got lost on the site after the first 2mins of looking round.