Your opinion on Black holes?

well ive been thinking alot about this latley

Is a black hole full of pressure?So much pressure that nothing can escape from even light(so ive heard) and even then can there be absolutley nothing in a black hole? I do find that impossible and yet things have suprised me. Maybe there gateways to other dementions or "teleports" to other black holes around the universe. It could also be a door to another universe? and if so what would be more than a universe?

Post ure thoughts and info, i really want to know
(also make sure its acually true)

 

Blackholes are not wormholes, which lead to other places. Black holes take anything and everything including light and compress them into nothing. Nothing to do with teleporting.

 

Black holes are Black, for a start.
If I'm right.. lol, Black holes are vaccumes.. And they contain alot of energy, Or something along those lines.

Someone smart, Please correct me!

*Waiting for Shredderbeam to Warn me for this post, lol*

 

Bah!

A black hole, according to our currently accepted theory, is an infinitely dense point of matter. All of its matter is contained at a point called the singularity. At and around this singularity (up to a point called the Schwartzchild Radius), space is so warped that it would require a speed greater than that of light to escape (hence why they're black).

Since space is warped around the black hole, time is also. If you watch someone fall into a black hole from your view point, they will never actually fall into it. They will simply freeze in space, right at the Schwartzchild Radius. From their perspective, they will continue to fall, and eventually be torn to subatomic particles.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole

And Rawrmonster, I can't warn you, because you backed up your opininon.

 

Stop thinking and start reading.
You're coming up with a lot of ideas that you seem to be making up. But you have to know more about black holes before you can form good ideas.

 

To put it simply, at the center of a black hole is a singular point of infinite dense matter. Anything and everything is compacted into a single point, including time.

 

Lol, I watched some Quantum physics DVD once.. And they said if they got a 1cm squared peice on the vaccume in the black hole... IT could like power the world

 

That was actually referring to the quantum energy that is inside 1 cubic centimeter of space.

 

ah black hole can not only capture light, it can also bend it, if a beam of light passes next to it, its bend out of shape.

 

That's it! You smartass. lol

Have you watched the 'What the bleep - down the rabbit hole' DVD?

I got it from there.

 

This is all just scientific presumptions with several facts to prove a statement but still they could be wrong. Not everything can be flawlessly proved therefore black holes still could be anything, its not like anyones entered one and come out to tell someone about it =P.

 

light can bend anyways, ever notice how you can see the suns light during an eclipse?

Also Black holes aren't necesarily black, they are only black within their event horizon (the extent of the radius around a black hole in which once something reaches it, it can not escape) So on/beyond the event horizon, light, and many more things are able to be visibly seen. The gravitational pull of a black hole pretty much makes light/matter orbit around it until it reaches the event horizon and from that point on space and time becomes distorted and matter is reduced to pretty much nothing, hence why it is black because nothing escapes on/beyond the event horizion.

I've also read about how a very dense object could possibly tear the very fabric of space/time, if this is indeed true then would it not be possible for black holes to be wormholes as suggested because that infinitely small, dense speck of matter rips the fabric of space/time here and in another point in space whereas the stuff pulled into a black hole is ejected? Because matter cannot be created or destroyed, it's a natural law, or so we think we know.

 

I often wonder about black holes. I think studying them will help us figure out more about the beginning of the universe, i.e. The Big Bang, since they both share the fact that they have a singularity.

 

Well i heard something like you will be torn into soo many small tiny pieces as each particle will try and get away from each other or soo I have heard.

 

Energy, in the form of heat radiates from black holes slowly. They are not black, but glow with heat and slowly (very slowly) evaporate. This loss of energy from the black hole is paid for by negative energy flowing in.

In simple terms, a negative energy states is one with less energy than a state that has zero gravitational field. This seems strange, because how can you have less mass, or energy than completely empty space? The secret to answering that question is by showing that empty space, isn't empty at all, but teeming with virtual particles (I can't explain this properly, look it up in a quantum field theory book) that only exist fleetingly.

An example of this is the Casimir effect.

Two mirrors placed face to face trap a slab of quantum vacuum between them. Mirrors reflect real photons of light, but also virtual photons aswell. This upsets the energy budget of the quantum vacuum, and when the sums are done, you find that the total energy of the modified vacuum state between the mirrors is less than the unmodified one, the one with mirrors (empty space).

 

If I remember properly, black holes are pretty self explainitory. Thery are black. Thery are holey. Black Holes.

No that argument aside, I remember this from science class last year:

Black holes are a rip in space where stars have collapsed inside on themself, and on the inside there is an absense of absolutely anything. And as the is an absense of space, there is nothing stopping itself from holding itself together. This causes a vacuum and everything that gets sucked in is compacted to over a millionth their size.

So if you put it this way, if you really did get transported somewhere else by getting into a black hole any way, you would be smaller than a grain of sand chopped up 500 times.

Very mysterious though.

 

A black hole is simply the result of a massive star's collapse, literally shrinking to an extremely small size, while retaining the original, if not more powerful, density of the initial star it once was. Thus giving it an overwhelmingly powerful amount of gravity.

Anything that comes within its gravitational reach will be either pulled towards it or similarly affected. Being close enough, yes, you will appear to remain in place while stretching out, being sucked towards it. The reason they're black is because they have so much power that light itself, which is matter, cannot escape it, which goes to show exactly how powerful it is.

Even if the light isn't close enough to be pulled towards it and contained, yes, it can be bent. Therefore if there is a star that appears to be next to the black hole, while being mean lightyears behind it, the light which is being directed towards you will be bent towards the black hole as it passes by, causing the far away star to appear as if it is nearer to the black hole.

But essentially, to answer your question, no, contrary to popular uneducated belief, a black hole isn't a wormhole, it isn't some freak of nature teleportation device, or anything of the sort. It's basically a lightless star of immense density possessing a massively powerful gravitational pull.

 

To be honest, nobody actually knows what happens when they enter the black hole...because nobody ever seen them again O_O Freaky.

 

please stop confusing stupid ass wishful thinking with actually having a fucking clue about physics. If you don't fully understand the concept of 'science' then may I suggest you go to kindergarten and get the ground work in before you start larking around with stupid crap like your above 'theory'.

 

Many laws in may areas of any kind of study are able to be defied under certain circumstances, and you being such an educated person should know this, it is wrong to hypothesize?