Another Simple Question

You Are A Moron
Adam And Eve Is Just A Story, Believe It If You Want But Dinosaurs Came First Cause Adam And Eve Are null

 

Ok I used a phrase more than once. Whee I must be special. And for failing to notice the other "owned" I supposedly typed, I must be really special, especially since I just checked the first page and found no use of the word owned, and checked the second and found only one use by me that wasn't a reply to you criticizing my use of the word. I think you need to learn to count, but I'll forgive you since you're a Creationist and probably don't know any better. Also, you have a certain way of avoiding all the points argued against you. I've not seen one valid reply to anything I've said.

I believe the first post went something like this:

The was never any statement as general as "first humans" in that post. You specifically said Adam, making a Biblical reference. For Adam to have existed before, with, or even after the dinosaurs, he would have to first exist in the first place. Thus, if Adam is included in the subject of the thread, this is a debate over whether there was an Adam who was the first human or not, and then if he existed before, with, or after the dinosaurs. If Adam isn't in the subject of the thread, this shouldn't even be posted since we have dated dinosaur bones to be 300 million years ago, and humans to maybe 1.5 million, and thats being really generous.

 

Lol, it's funny, because he does to me as well. I proved him wrong, with quotes from his very own Quran, and he still dismissed them, telling me I was full of BS and that I know nothing about religion, then resorts to personal attacks, calling me immature and telling to grow up.

Those stats are inaccurate, footprints preserved in volcanic ash in Tanzania, proves that there were humans 3.7 million years ago. A lot more than twice of your "generous" offer.

 

You didn't provide any real verses from the Quran Personal Jesus. Stop trying to show that you are the better one. Just for once accept that you are not the best and that you are not always right. Actually from reading your earlier supporting reasons and arguments in multiple threads, you have been mostly wrong and tried turning the own person's words against themselves. Yet you have succeeded nothing in return.

 

No, those were made by a human ancestor, Australopithecus afarensis. They aren't even in the genus Homo. The oldest footprints of the genus Homo are only about 200,000 years old.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/2844287.stm

 

The Big Bang theory is still a theory, yes, just as evolution and gravity are theories.

I don't see why a God needed to create the universe, as opposed to it coming into existence of its own accord. God simply adds another degree of complexity, making it more likely to be incorrect.

 

wow. im not sure.

 

The body of evidence against any notion of Adam and Eve in general is quite, quite large...and in any case, the Bible makes no reference to dinosaurs living before Adam and Eve.

 

What is a behemoth? Any suggestions?

 

I believe Adam didn't exist, even if he did, it would never have been before the dinosaurs.

 

It's a mythical creature which looks like a mix between a water buffalo and a rhino.

 

omg you people. we dont even sure if the dinosaur even exist.its just the crazy scientist theory when they found the dinosaur bones then they said 'hmm lets call this owner of the bones we found a trecodytel and a species of dinosaur..it must live in packs due to the size of its bone bla bla bla'. theory can be right or wrong and i say dinosaur didnt even exist.

 

Actually, they base their conclusions on a hell of a lot more than that. If dinosaurs didn't exist, what are those massive bones, then?

 

Do either of those animals have tails like a cedar? Not even close.

 

Omg that's SOOOO true! I'm totally converting to Christianity, because those scientists must be completely out of their mind, calling bones from large, extincted animals dinosaurs! Yeah, let's all completely ignore facts and believe in Adam and Eve stories, despite the fact that there isn't a single piece of evidence in their favor!

If you died, the average IQ among teenagers would increase by 15%.

I never said it was an exact mix between a water buffalo or a rhino. Just that they share physical similarities.

 

lol i never realised how many atheists are on this forums, im glad. and yeah, im sorry but if you believe that all humans are the result of incest than maybe thats why its so easy to feed you all the other bullshit.

 

You can't really say that because you don't know how old the bible is. It seems that the bible isn't that really old, but if you read the story where it talks about Noah's Ark, it talks about all the generations of his family. It starts with a guy, then it goes to his son/daughter, then his son/daughter, then his son/daugther, etc.

But if you believe in god, you should think that adam and eve came first.

Edit:

You need to get your dick out of our asses. What idiot told you that us christians believe that dinosaurs are a myth? Get your facts straight, or think before you speak.

 

Teh Fallen iz back with the real knowledge on his side. According to the bible there was no death until sin. No the atheists wont own him, god IS real and will shine where ever there is darkness if you let him.

 

adam b4 dinos

 

So... you're so stubborn that you come up with some kind of animal mixture that doesn't fit the description just to avoid admitting it's obvious similarity to various dinosaurs?
Figures...