Trumps proposal for Temp Muslim Ban

Lol mate, you don't have any info. You are just repeating the things you have been spoonfed by anti-Trump propagandist.

You can't even reply to stuff like him creating over 34000 jobs. Because you have no spoonfed info about this. Now imagine him paying an average 40k$(just using random figure) yearly wage per person, that's 1.36bil in wages. Now deduct the taxes from their wages. Not familiar with the US tax system, but I'd imagine it being around 20-30% of your income. So tell me, has US benefited from this "moron" you call Trump?

 

Lmao, so many basic humans on this thread it's unreal. Would you rather look like a racist, or witness daily be-headings because you didn't do something to stop the problem?

Yeah bookmark this post, if trump doesn't go through then come back to this post in a couple years and you'll realise.

"Oh it's only a minority of them ruining for the majority" LOL.
What happens when that minority of the religion starts taking out the majority of the world because everyone is to scared to look like a racist and stop it?

Whoever claimed that Islam is a religion of peace, I love how it is clearly stated by their pedo messager to (Not exact words but feel free to look it up) kill any non-believers till they turn to jizhi or w.e. that rubbish is.

So either 1) People claiming to be muslims or one certain branch of muslim aren't if they aren't following this.

or 2) they pretend, let them gear up with the black market etc. And oh look at ol mate mohammed, lived a nice life at age of 40 he decided to blow himself up in a shopping mall killing hundreds of people.

I know someone is going to quote this with some stupid reasoning on how I'm wrong but I'll just repost this exact post. I haven't linked any source or rubbish because tbh, if you don't know by now you'll never wake up till it's to late.
You all know this to be true.

 

Here are the verses you referenced:

Kill everyone who does not follow Muhammad's laws:

Fight the unbelievers until there is no more disbelief:

Terrorize and behead disbelievers:

 

Please give a valid argument that he'd make a terrible leader.

Also, what is so unattractive about a political revolution to you? Do you like our current political leaders and their laws? If you do, then there is absolutely no reason to argue with you. It would be an utter waste of time, and as some say, time is money.

 

I've made an argument if you took the time to read this entire argument... I'm not here to argue about Donald Trump it's a god given fact he would be a disaster for this country, and I'm down for a political revolution, but good job jumping the gun and thinking I'd oppose it. But in this day and age we really don't need a political revolution at this moment. We need a Bernie Sanders.

 

12+ killed by Islamic bombing in Damascus today

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-syria-blast-idUSKCN0YX05Y

11 killed by Islamic bombing in Instanbul 4 days ago

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-36466744

The death toll for Islam continues to climb past 100 million.

 

Here's a off the wall opinion on this matter for you, I support trump BUT not the Muslim ban. Money makes the world turn my friends, One can say we need X thing and x things to fix this country but it boils right down to the Economy and honestly I think trump could fix it, He's a professional in building things up and has came back from bankruptcy more than once, He wants america to Make its own shit again and produce more jobs IMO thats all this country needs. NAFTA FUCKED US OVER PRAISE CLINTON IF YOU WANT BUT READ ABOUT NAFTA, Hilary will be no better than her husband. You never really see the effects of a president until some years /AFTER/ they leave.

As for the muslim ban I strongly feel the war on terror and the war on drugs is a WAR ON YOU, Terrorist exsist but not just islamic ones ALL KINDS do. Your government wants you to be afraid of false threats, and when you are afraid you Trade your freedom for protection from non exsisting or very exaggeratted threats. The news is a joke its biast on every channel, Look up "Viacom" they own 90% of all television. I could go on more but thats going deepr int he rabbit hole.

Fact is we have nothing to be afraid of (unless you are afraid of martial law and a full government takeover) which I promise will happen before a few islamic radicals with old Ak-47s swim across the ocean to get you, and some how magicly take this country over.

I won't be voting this year, i feel no one should be the president. If you want more money in your pockets vote trump, If you want more free shit vote clinton. Just know nothings ever really free. Thats why SSI is about to fall under. I think we are intellagent human beings and can totally view more than TWO WAYS to solve problems. The system is broken and has been for a while, You can blame presidents, terrorist, gays, yourself and each other but its the SYSTEM and it needs to be rebuilt from the ground up.Quit viewing your world as "red" and "blue" don't let them confine your mind to what /they/ tell you your allowed to.

 

50+ killed in Islamic attack in Florida last night

http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/12/us/orlando-nightclub-shooting/

The death toll for Islam continues to climb over 100 million

 

How would banning Muslims stop someone that was already here?

 

When was the last ISIS terror attack that wasn't labeled as domestic terrorism? I don't recall a story, specifically on a similar scale as this or even relevant as the San Bernardino terror attack where the perpetrator was not a US citizen besides 9/11 which happened many years ago. So again, how would blocking out what's already in help and why is this relevant to the thread?

 

Labeled by who, and what relevance do labels have?

Are you asking for examples of Muslims attacking civilians in countries they aren't originally from, or Muslims attacking civilians in countries they were born in? What about when Muslims blow up planes over international airspace, which does that fall under?

But yes, San Bernardino and WTC are two examples of Muslims travelling to the United States in order to kill infidels.

If you have an army of people who believe they are commanded by god to kill innocent people, the goal is to protect those innocent people from harm. Unfortunately, even being on the FBI's terror watchlist didn't do anything to stop Omar Mateen from carrying out Allah's commands and killing 50 homosexual infidels.

 

Labeled by the police/investigators/FBI. You see, domestic terrorism and terrorism are different terms, one of which usually highlights that the offender is a citizen. This is very important moving forward.

I didn't ask for anything because the sentence was declarative, not interrogative. I'm saying I don't recall a terror attack in the U.S. of significant scale in which the offender is not a U.S. citizen, neglecting 9/11 because that happened over a decade ago.

I'll remind you because it seems you forgot. Trump's proposal is to temporarily ban muslims from coming into the U.S (non-citizens). If that proposal was currently active, it would have no effect on what happened in Orlando. So I ask you, what relevance does the two have?

You didn't even answer the question directly or effectively.

What is the relevance between Trump's proposal and a U.S. citizen committing a terror attack?

 

His parents are Taliban supporting Muslims who immigrated to the United States from Afghanistan. If Muslims could not immigrate to the United States, Omar would not have been born a US citizen.

 

How long ago did they immigrate?

 

Yes, we need someone who will tax us to death, so we can be like communist Russia. I'd love to wear some "squeaky shoes".

Notice the sarcasm.

 

It would prevent future attacks.

 

How so? The offender was a U.S. citizen.

 

US Citizen and Muslim are not exclusive terms.

 

The Muslim is a U.S. citizen, correct. So how would Trump's proposal affect him? It wouldn't. He is in the U.S. already. I don't think I can make this any simpler than it already is.

 

I'll repeat: