@Superman/Shin - Voidboosting

I should have taken screenshots when making my initial report here, I think Superman/Shin might have misinterpreted what was done? Not asking for a reversal of the decision, just want to make sure it's clear.

http://www.sythe.org/dispute-forum-archive/1853723-thread-problem.html

As you know, off-site feedback means nothing when it comes to Sythe. Voidboosting deliberately quoted his off-site feedback in a Sythe quote manner to mislead customers into thinking that they were on-site vouches. He had stated in his TWC "dispute" that using vouches from other forums was not against the rules in the LOL boosting market rules. However he failed to realize that it is against the site-wide rules.
http://sythe.org/sythe-org-news/148431-official-sythe-org-rules.html

"I made the mistake of using good feedback from other forums"
This is a slanted truth - Void used good feedback quoted in a Sythe manner.

Zalsers (blue boost) was temp banned and given a TWC for the exact same offence. I have no doubt this feedback actually belongs to blue boost, as I know him as a trusted booster on ePVP. However, the fact that he tried to pass it off as Sythe feedback led to a ban and TWC.

http://www.sythe.org/report-spammer-archive/1809041-reported-post-eliteeloboost.html


Other sellers implement off-site feedback into their threads with no problems at all, like lpuniversity: http://www.sythe.org/lol-boosting-t...ger-ranked-top-20-pricematch-4500-orders.html
Image posted on thread: http://i.imgur.com/knt9QRR.png

I don't understand why the TWC was removed so lightly following this incident.
Thanks

 

Hmm ok I am reading even more into this. I don't think there was any intentional wrongdoing by VoidBoosting. It looked to me as though he quoted his feedback from other vB websites like elitepvpers that use a quote function similar to sythe.org's. The feedback on VoidBoosting's thread was legitimate, though from those other websites. I'm also pretty sure that "vouches are not honored" on sythe.org refers to counting vouches, so you can't go and request a change in your thread title saying add in "[1000 vouches]" if they're all offsite.

If anyone else, like zalsers, was given a TWC for that (and exactly that) then we can remove their TWC for them.

 

True, that could be possible.

But for some reason he has no problem posting off-site feedback on epicNPC as screenshots?
http://www.epicnpc.com/threads/6391...lenger-Booster-★★-Trusted✔-Cheap✔-★Discounts✔

http://i.imgur.com/898uFYu.png

 

If I'm remembering correctly, he had the same sort of screenshot on his sythe.org thread too. Probably found it very tedious to keep creating screenshots like that and decided to quote the rest. Anyway this sort of thing seems to happen a lot in the league market so I think I'll add a rule noting that offsite feedback must be marked as offsite.

 

I looked further into it and confirmed that yes, he did have those screenshots on his sythe.org thread too https://web.archive.org/web/2015032...osting-up-master-trusted-cheap-discounts.html.

 

That only adds to my case - why not be consistent with the rest of the offsite vouches as well, unless they were deliberately tried to pass off as sythe.org vouches?

To address your point that he found it tedious to keep creating screenshots and deciding to quote the rest:
Note that the vouches faked as sythe.org vouches actually come BEFORE the ones screenshotted in his epvp thread.
http://www.elitepvpers.com/forum/le...allenger-booster-trusted-cheap-discounts.html


Anyhow I'm just trying to provide information here.

 

First off the order of them doesn't really matter to me because I wouldn't take that as proof of intentional wrongdoing. Second, I think what you posted is wrong because the images seem come first in both the elitepvpers thread and the cache of the sythe.org thread I linked. Then the first quoted vouch is from Diamond1Boosting.

I'm going to close this, thanks anyways.