Responsibility.. A new rule.

Discussion in 'Archives' started by The Dark, Mar 27, 2007.

?

New Rule?

  1. This is a good idea, and will provide extra safety.

    65.2%
  2. This is a bad idea and should not be introduced.

    34.8%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Responsibility.. A new rule.
  1. Unread #1 - Mar 27, 2007 at 1:10 PM
  2. The Dark
    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2007
    Posts:
    1,601
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    The Dark Guru
    Banned

    Responsibility.. A new rule.

    Ok.
    You have a pet, it's your property, your responsibility.
    You have a pencil case, that's also your property, therefore your responsibility.

    Do you see my point?

    You property, is your responsibility.

    Ok, so my post's looking rather pointless. I hate to name names, but i feel it's a worthey example.

    The Lobster.

    He has been 'Hacked'.

    His e-mail to be precise.

    This then ended up with a innocent member being hacked.

    I find that his e-mail should be his property and his responsibility.

    The fact is, that nobody knows the truth, except him.

    So here is my proposal.

    A new rule.

    "Being hacked"
    Getting 'hacked' is your fault, nobody else's. If you get 'hacked' and the other person has liable proof this should be forced to be repayed.
    All cases should be debatable, but if found 'guilty' the person in question should be perm banned, with a I.P ban in some cases.

    Let me know your opinion, as this is only mine.

    Thanks for reading.
     
  3. Unread #2 - Mar 27, 2007 at 1:14 PM
  4. Mafia Coder
    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2007
    Posts:
    263
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Mafia Coder Forum Addict
    Banned

    Responsibility.. A new rule.

    its not the other persons fault if they get hacked, its not something they can prevent, therefore they cant stop it so.....
     
  5. Unread #3 - Mar 27, 2007 at 1:20 PM
  6. The Dark
    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2007
    Posts:
    1,601
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    The Dark Guru
    Banned

    Responsibility.. A new rule.

    Mafia, with the right anti-virus, and protection. You are safe from hackers. You will only get hacked if your computer is unsafe, therefore it is preventable.
     
  7. Unread #4 - Mar 27, 2007 at 1:34 PM
  8. WoW Sucks
    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2007
    Posts:
    3,708
    Referrals:
    3
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    WoW Sucks Global Moderator
    Banned

    Responsibility.. A new rule.

    I think its a good rule. You should scan everyfile you download, if not its your fault if you get hacked.
     
  9. Unread #5 - Mar 27, 2007 at 1:51 PM
  10. Repentless
    Joined:
    May 11, 2006
    Posts:
    669
    Referrals:
    3
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Repentless Apprentice
    Banned

    Responsibility.. A new rule.

    Good idea. He should at least be required to pay the money back, and it was his own fault if he didn't use adequate antivirus protection. Unless he has proof otherwise, it's his fault.
     
  11. Unread #6 - Mar 27, 2007 at 2:03 PM
  12. 17th Alley
    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2007
    Posts:
    290
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    17th Alley Forum Addict

    Responsibility.. A new rule.

    Yep, i agree with it. If you protect yourself and you dont download "runescape password crackers" (lolz), then u wont be hacked. Sure, they can try to brute force! Then change your password every week.
     
  13. Unread #7 - Mar 27, 2007 at 2:04 PM
  14. The Dark
    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2007
    Posts:
    1,601
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    The Dark Guru
    Banned

    Responsibility.. A new rule.

    Thanks for all the support people! Keep it coming!
     
  15. Unread #8 - Mar 27, 2007 at 2:13 PM
  16. Sin666
    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2006
    Posts:
    6,989
    Referrals:
    21
    Sythe Gold:
    0
    Two Factor Authentication User Detective Heidy

    Sin666 Hero
    Crabby Retired Administrator

    Responsibility.. A new rule.

    When an email/msn address is worth over 50m, as with any trusted/official, then you certainly have an obligation to make sure it's secure.

    If being hacked were accepted as an excuse, then all scamming MM's would be able to dodge blame, and the system would fall apart. Therefore, people *have* to be held responsible.

    All this I agree with. But so far, this community has done exceptionally well in upholding this - I don't see where this thread is going.

    If you're suggesting the lobster deserves punishment, then I disagree. He has offered to repay what was scammed and, provided he does so, I believe he's met his obligation.

    If I didn't believe he was hacked, it would be different. But, I spoke with the hacker, both on Lob's MSN, and on the scammer's main address, and I believe TheLobster had no involvement. Further, total damage was said to be only 3m.

    As long as it doesn't happen again (which might suggest negligence), then there's no harm done. As I understand, a lot of people get hacked/keylogged at least once. As the MSN dp hack showed, it's not always blatant carelessness that's the cause. If, however, the MM in question were prone to downloading "Free HAI2D PK vids!" without scanning them, then a ban, TwC, or title-removal might be appropriate.

    Again, I think Sythe deals well with the "being hacked" cases. The MM's deserve to be examined on a case-by-case basis.
     
  17. Unread #9 - Mar 27, 2007 at 2:20 PM
  18. Gemzy
    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2005
    Posts:
    711
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Gemzy Apprentice
    Banned

    Responsibility.. A new rule.

    I agree. YOU are responsible of your MSN account AND sythe account. Good idea.
     
  19. Unread #10 - Mar 27, 2007 at 2:24 PM
  20. Th4 Ub3r Qu3st3r wh0 0wnz
    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2007
    Posts:
    449
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Th4 Ub3r Qu3st3r wh0 0wnz Forum Addict
    Do Not Trade

    Responsibility.. A new rule.

    i think its a good idea very good, then we dont get that shit anymore "i am hacked couldnt do anything about it" that sucks.

    i think i support you;)
    how many vouches you need to get the rule here!?! or doesnt that goes that way? (just asking lol:p)
     
  21. Unread #11 - Mar 27, 2007 at 2:37 PM
  22. The Dark
    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2007
    Posts:
    1,601
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    The Dark Guru
    Banned

    Responsibility.. A new rule.


    Where is this thread going? To the rules page hopefully.
    I am not just making this post to get The Lobster banned, and if you read all my 1st post, you will see i say you only get banned if you don't repay it.

    This is a good idea as it will mean people will take extra care\precautions, and i think that it would be a useful rule to have.

    As far as i have seen, there is more reasons to have it than not.

    Thanks for your opinion anyway, i respect you.
     
  23. Unread #12 - Mar 27, 2007 at 2:50 PM
  24. The TK
    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2007
    Posts:
    95
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    The TK Member
    Banned

    Responsibility.. A new rule.

    The lobster is a good guy, hes paying back the people that been scammed.

    Edit: I do agree with this rule.
     
  25. Unread #13 - Mar 27, 2007 at 2:53 PM
  26. dpunk
    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2007
    Posts:
    1,562
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    dpunk Guru
    Banned

    Responsibility.. A new rule.

    I agree, if your not responsible enough to keep your passwords safe, then gtfo of sythe b/c I sure don't wanna lose 50m because somone who's respected fucks up.

    edit: however if someone does get hacked and agrees to repay, then no harm has been done, but if they don't agree to, perm ban FTW!
     
  27. Unread #14 - Mar 27, 2007 at 3:19 PM
  28. Fire_Ant_X
    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2006
    Posts:
    607
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Fire_Ant_X Forum Addict
    Banned

    Responsibility.. A new rule.

    This sounds good except this could lead to the 'hacker' working with one of his friends to scam the person who got hacked out of money ie if the hackers friend says he got scammed out of x amount of gp and he has screenshots to prove it the person who was hacked would be responsible for paying back the hackers friend.
     
  29. Unread #15 - Mar 27, 2007 at 3:22 PM
  30. Faskist
    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2005
    Posts:
    1,869
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Faskist Tuxhead
    Banned

    Responsibility.. A new rule.

    I say any staff member who gets hacked loses their position for incompetence.
     
  31. Unread #16 - Mar 27, 2007 at 3:26 PM
  32. The Dark
    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2007
    Posts:
    1,601
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    The Dark Guru
    Banned

    Responsibility.. A new rule.

    But do you agree with my rule? :)

    And i agree with you btw lol
     
  33. Unread #17 - Mar 27, 2007 at 3:31 PM
  34. XSafire
    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2005
    Posts:
    950
    Referrals:
    2
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    XSafire Apprentice
    Banned

    Responsibility.. A new rule.

    if you got hacked would you feel the same way?

    if you got hacked, then thats not your problem. There ARE msn hackig programs out there.
     
  35. Unread #18 - Mar 27, 2007 at 3:35 PM
  36. 7Sniperz0wn7
    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2007
    Posts:
    137
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    7Sniperz0wn7 Active Member
    Banned

    Responsibility.. A new rule.

    Brute force does not get every combination and would take weeks if not months to crack an average pass with numbers and the lobster probably has a long pass with numbers in it
     
  37. Unread #19 - Mar 27, 2007 at 3:35 PM
  38. The Dark
    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2007
    Posts:
    1,601
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    The Dark Guru
    Banned

    Responsibility.. A new rule.

    xsafire, i would feel the exact same way.

    I don't feel myself to be superior to anybody.

    And, your opinion is welcome, but the majority seem to disagree.
     
  39. Unread #20 - Mar 27, 2007 at 3:35 PM
  40. Xjaa
    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2007
    Posts:
    3,248
    Referrals:
    2
    Sythe Gold:
    0
    Lawrence Potamus

    Xjaa Penguin
    $100 USD Donor

    Responsibility.. A new rule.

    Lobby is to good a guy to have to dea lwit this if he is even considered for de-modding i will be suprised
     
< Sin666 refused mming for no reason... | Hi homies for user ed? >

Users viewing this thread
1 guest
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.


 
 
Adblock breaks this site