Proof?

Lol. I love when that happens.

 

I hate it when people can get away with things because there is no proof...

Someone reported NSA bla bla something for attempting to scam.... two days later reported him for scamming.

 

Happened to me back in 2011 (the PM scam): http://www.sythe.org/report-scammer-archive/1276212-djinn-scammer.html

He got banned few months after scamming me.

 

Ouch! It's always awful that people tend to not believe that "trusted" / oldfags can scam, but it happens.

 

That is why some form of screen recorder is your best friend when trading.

 

My previous post prove that video proofs are sometimes not enough, but yea I never trade without Camtasia Studio

 

lol travon martin case had a lot of proof yet no smart jury. Sometimes people just WANT to be blind to the truth.

 

Ohohohohoooo...I'm not touching that one lmao =p.

 

Please, expound on this proof. I would love to hear your obviously qualified opinion.

 

I had the same thing happen to me first time I got scammed, it was by a "2010" member which I thought you know.. You've been on this site for 3 years why would you throw it all away for 60m?

Turns out 60m is a lot for some people and this was when I first joined so 60m was like .2? Maybe a bit more.

 

Ok mr.smart guy. First of all the whole freaking world knew that this guy got out of his car to pursue someone who he felt was bad (because they where black). Also Zimmerman was not a freaking cop. He pursued him and then when travon stood his ground (he felt threatened), Zimmerman and him got into physical conflict. Then there was a scream heard by people in the area. The jury (all women almost all white). Claimed it was Zimmerman. But if you look at it this way (logical way) Couldn't the scream have been Travon? I mean wouldn't someone scream at the top of their longs when a bullet is incinerating through their flesh (they found that the bullet was about 513 degrees F when fired)? Couldn't that scream have been the last sound Travon made? mhm point made. The president agrees , most of America agrees, most of the world agrees, The justice department agrees that the jury made a wrong verdict.

 

He was "bad", for the record. The kid was high as a kite when he was killed. He was a troublemaker in school, had been involved in several robberies, suspended/expelled, etc. There had been robberies in the area, and trayvon was peeking into front windows of various homes. If that were my neighborhood I would have done the same thing.

Never said he was a cop. Good to know that trayvon felt threatened though. Did he tell you that? Call you up? Did you see video evidence? An eyewitness testimony perhaps? No?

Then stop with your assumptions, that doesnt fly in court kid.

Of course it could have been Trayvon. It could have been Zimmerman as well. No one knows, and no one can prove it one way or another, which constitutes something called "reasonable doubt".

The president is a racist as is his wife and most of his associates in his earlier years. Of course he will take every opportunity to play the race card (which is ironic, since Obama is considered black at 12.5% african american, whereas Zimmerman is now classified as white despite being 50% hispanic). The DOJ is obviously compelled by POTUS, so that means absolutely nothing.

Good to see that you are so tuned in to the intricacies of this case to such an extent that you are more qualified then a court of law.

 

Did the president tell you he is racist? Also the jury felt Zimmerman was (definitely the voice ) . Also instead of bitching at me bitch at the jury. Also of course he would have felt threatend. Thus the struggle those two had. Plus the fact at the end of the struggle one was left dead. Now if you're telling me that Zimmerman wanted to pick a fight with random people and walked out and suddenly attacked travon (who you claim was not feeling threatend) then that means Zimmerman was not practicing his rights but rather killing (non threatend people) for fun. Think before you speak. I am done with this convo. Like i said bitch at the jury not me. You claim my opinion is not qualified well it's because it is an opinion.... Your opinion or credibility is well uhh lets just say.... NVM. But hey nice TWC.


IM DONE WITH THIS CONVO.

 

I am telling you that you are clueless, not tracking most of the inner workings of the case, and don't understand how the judicial system works.

Personally, I think Zimmerman provoked Trayvon and then killed him. I think he had good intentions when he walked up to Trayvon, but then provoked him and shot him dead.

HOWEVER, if you follow the case, and watched the trial, the ACTUAL EVIDENCE presented is all circumstantial, at best. As such, given that one is presumed to be innocent until proven guilty, the jury made the correct decision in deciding not guilty. Now does that mean he is innocent in the entire ordeal? Not necessarily, it just means that the evidence was not sufficient to warrant a conviction.

/responses

 

You probably don't know how the judicial system works. Heck you can't even follow sythe rules... But anyways there is option of with holding evidence or "over looking" you can only show what you have but what if there was more to show which was not shown? also the part where Zimmerman choose not to speak. "Practicing his right" they called it but in reality it was a "GET OUT OF JAIL-FREE" card. And he played it. I am done with this convo now as i first said please direct your attention to the jury and bitch at them.

REREAD the post you quoted. I edited it before you responded.

 

LOL, its called the Fifth Amendment dude. If you have an issue with that then you live in the wrong country.

 

If what Plzm8 said was true about the robberies and the peeking into houses... then good riddance, I must say.

I never kept up with this case, though, and I don't plan on being a part of it.