North Korea/ WWIII?

Discussion in 'Something For All' started by LetsSell, Apr 13, 2013.

North Korea/ WWIII?
  1. Unread #21 - Apr 15, 2013 at 10:53 PM
  2. Sacro
    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Posts:
    1,983
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Sacro Gunny - 168gr SMK Shooter
    $5 USD Donor Retired Sectional Moderator

    North Korea/ WWIII?

    North Korea only wants to assume a position of strength to increase their value for disarmament. In terms of war, our largest nuclear weapon has a yield 4761 times larger than theirs.
     
  3. Unread #22 - Apr 18, 2013 at 2:54 AM
  4. gtdarkpunisher
    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2007
    Posts:
    2,501
    Referrals:
    1
    Sythe Gold:
    202
    Discord Unique ID:
    329211424809418753
    Discord Username:
    123fakest

    gtdarkpunisher Grand Master

    North Korea/ WWIII?

    There is no question that North Korea can be easily beat, but the question is:

    What will they start?

    Their threats may seem like a joke but its not just about US vs NK. Countries have and continue to be two faced when beneficial to them, there is alliances and always will be.

    They do not stand alone, but they are loud.
     
  5. Unread #23 - Apr 18, 2013 at 1:56 PM
  6. shottoyourface
    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2013
    Posts:
    98
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    shottoyourface Member
    Banned

    North Korea/ WWIII?

    I don't think I'd say easily beat, we would have to take them out via infantry Because if we used nukes etc. that would start problems with china as well as other countries near. and you seen what happened last time they definitely don't stand even the slightest chance but many many people would be lost in the process especially if south korea tries to help as it will be another fighting friends and enemy situation not knowing who to trust.

    I wouldn't use the term two faced either just because someone is your enemy or you don't get along with them doesn't mean you can't or wont do deals with them as long as it helps you out. I don't keep much details on this whole fiasco as it has been going on for years and years but I believe there is only a small portion of the countries in the world that embargo NK, the rest just simply don't trade with them because they usually have nothing worth while. so unless they started they are going to embargo them that isn't being two faced at all.

    Last but not least china has pretty much solely kept NK afloat and with them being a huge force in the trade market they have the power to help make trades happen for NK without a doubt if not for China NK would have been taken over by SK long ago.
     
  7. Unread #24 - Apr 21, 2013 at 1:15 PM
  8. iAGZzzz
    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2012
    Posts:
    1,168
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    11
    Gohan has AIDS SytheSteamer Extreme Homosex

    iAGZzzz Guru
    $5 USD Donor New

    North Korea/ WWIII?

    After seeing what has happened to other dictators who got too lenient, the K-Dawg has realised if he doesn't show people how powerful he is, a revolution could mean the end of him.

    Dictators in Egypt and Libya got too relaxed, didn't maintain their firm power over the people. Kim jong un needs to show himself to the people to be powerful, and not one to mess with. If people see that, people will not stand against him as they know they are powerless, no matter the number of people.

    It's all a power show, however if North Korea keep probing, other countries will get antagonised and no WWIII would not happen, North Korea wouldn't stand a chance it would be over that quickly.
     
< Sexism & my defense of rape | US Minimum Wage >

Users viewing this thread
1 guest


 
 
Adblock breaks this site