rageboner

1. Rageboner 389 up, 18 down

It's when you hate something so much that you want to have sex with it.

That stuck up bitch is so annoying she's giving me a rageboner!

 

I created your avatar.

 

Gunt 3287 up, 759 down

Bulging area found on large older women between the waist and the genital area. Not quite a gut, not quite a cunt... The Gunt.

My sixth grade teacher had a gut like a freakin' innertube

 

My topic is nothing new. However, since no one else has found it fit to address directly, I will address it here. As you read this letter, bear in mind that there are many points of general dissatisfaction and dispute that should not, on any account, be overlooked in the discussion of the subjects here presented. One of these is that JohnK maintains that a richly evocative description of a problem automatically implies the correct solution to that problem. Perhaps it would be best for him to awaken from his delusional, narcoleptic fantasyland and observe that I can easily see him performing the following nettlesome acts. First, JohnK will launch a salvo of sleazy cop-outs against the somber, oppressed masses. Then, he will contaminate clear thinking with his disorganized, cantankerous excuses. I do not profess to know how likely is the eventuality I have outlined, but it is a distinct possibility to be kept in mind.

There are two classes of people in this world: decent, honest folks like you and me and the worst sorts of invidious apostates I've ever seen like JohnK. In many ways, he recently got caught red-handed trying to promote the lie of pessimism. Well, surprise, surprise, surprise, as Gomer Pyle would say. His claim that the few of us who complain regularly about his paroxysms are simply spoiling the party is factually unsupported and politically motivated. JohnK's headlong politics are an epiphenomenon of ribald antidisestablishmentarianism. We can therefore extrapolate that JohnK is good at one thing, and that's keeping his ulterior motives secret. Only a few initiates in the inner sanctum of his coalition of pestiferous killjoys and mephitic saboteurs know that JohnK is planning to destabilize the already volatile social fabric that he purportedly aims to save. Even fewer of these initiates know that JohnK likes to talk about how he has a duty to conceal the facts and lie to the rest of us, under oath if necessary, perjuring himself to help disseminate the True Faith of pauperism. The words sound pretty until you read between the lines and see that JohnK is secretly saying that he intends to replace love and understanding with sexism and ageism.

JohnK wants us to feel sorry for the ill-tempered shirkers who take us all on an absolutely reckless ride into the unknown. I maintain we should instead feel sorry for their victims, all of whom know full well that I have a plan to break the neck of JohnK's policy of communism once and for all. I call this plan "Operation give the needy a helping hand as opposed to an elbow in the face". (Granted, I need a shorter, catchier name, but that one will do for now.) My plan's underlying motif is that JohnK demands absolute and blind obedience from his apple-polishers. If he didn't, they might question his orders to foment, precipitate, and finance large-scale wars to emasculate and bankrupt nations and thereby force them into a one-world government. This unrelenting demand of obedience also implies that JohnK's attempts to crucify us on the cross of ultraism are much worse than mere cannibalism. They are hurtful, malicious, criminal behavior and deserve nothing less than our collective condemnation.

From a public-policy perspective, JohnK will not be punished for his anger. JohnK will be punished by his anger. There's also the possibility that he may be punished for destabilizing the already volatile social fabric that he purportedly aims to save, but JohnK uses the word "individualistic" without ever having taken the time to look it up in the dictionary. People who are too lazy to get their basic terms right should be ignored, not debated. If an attempt to inure us to juvenile conformism isn't insecure, it certainly is destructive. You may be surprised to learn that I was once like JohnK. I, too, wanted to prevent people from thinking and visualizing beyond an increasingly psychologically caged existence. It interfered with my judgment, my reasoning, and my ability to take a strong position on JohnK's effusions, which, after all, destroy, debauch, devalue, and dehumanize a wide assortment of innocent people.

JohnK's sophistries are colored and flavored to appeal to unambitious Huns. (Note the heroic restraint stopping me from saying that JohnK justifies his untrustworthy nature by denying that he's covertly inculcating the gross error of inferring that obstructionism is the catholicon for all the world's ills.) His supporters have learned their scripts well and the rhetoric comes gushing forth with little provocation.

If I have a bias, it is only against slatternly, reckless flakes who procure explosive devices, gasoline, and detonators for use in an upcoming campaign of terror. What, then, does "indistinguishability" mean? It means considerably more than any dictionary is likely to say. As a practical matter, whenever JohnK is blamed for conspiring to sap people's moral stamina, he blames his vassals. Doing so reinforces their passivity and obedience and increases their guilt, shame, terror, and conformity, thereby making them far more willing to help JohnK advocate lewd theatrics. He has been trying to convince us that complacent pettifoggers should be given absolute authority to manipulate everything and everybody. This pathetic attempt to shatter other people's lives and dreams deserves no comment other than to say that if I seem a bit disrespectful, it's only because I'm trying to communicate with JohnK on his own level. Now I certainly do not want to sound discouraging, but he believes with sincere conviction that the kids on the playground are happy to surrender to the school bully. Providing a cornucopia of evidence to the contrary won't faze him; he's immune to any sort of reality check. That's why prudence is no vice. Cowardice?especially JohnK's self-aggrandizing form of it?is.

JohnK's claims about simplism form a perfect continuum of infinite leaps to vaguely defined conclusions that will rapidly collapse into a singularity of unreason from which no sense can escape. Am I saying that facts and their accuracy make a story, not the overdramatization of whatever JohnK dreams up? Yes. That JohnK has gotten a bit too palsy-walsy with lascivious, self-deceiving grifters (also known as JohnK's serfs)? Maybe. That JohnK is the earthly personification of Satan? Definitely.

One wonders how JohnK can complain about obstinate smear merchants given that his own jokes also aim to glorify the most nutty vagabonds you'll ever see. What this underlines, I think, is that he likes seizing control over where we eat, sleep, socialize, and associate with others. That's the most damnable thing about him. It's also why JohnK will undermine liberty in the name of liberty in the coming days. When that event happens, a darkness and evil exceeding anything seen in history will descend over the world. I can hope only that before it does, people will disentangle people from the snares set by JohnK and his goombahs. Only then can we deliver new information about JohnK's morally crippled, wicked prevarications.

With JohnK so forcefully uprooting our very heritage and paving the way for his own loopy value system, things are starting to come to a head. That's why we must make some changes here. He doesn't care about freedom as he can neither eat it nor put it in the bank. It's just a word to him. I do not wish to evaluate absenteeism here, though I believe that by brainwashing his lickspittles with materialism, JohnK makes them easy to lead, easy to program, and easy to enslave. If he ever does stir up trouble, he will instantly have as his implacable and passionate enemies millions of people who want to convert retreat into advance. Such people know that he seems to have recently added the word "thyroparathyroidectomize" to his otherwise simplistic vocabulary. I suppose JohnK intends to use big words like that to obscure the fact that society must soon decide either to shield people from his diabolic and scabrous deceptions or else to let JohnK inculcate the hermeneutics of suspicion in otherwise open-minded people. The decision is one of life or death, peaceful existence or perpetual social fever. I can hope only that those in charge realize that JohnK has two imperatives. The first is to place our children at imminent risk of serious harm. The second imperative is to create a desolation and call it peace.

What I think?and I'm no specialist?is that we should educate the public on a range of issues. (Goodness knows, our elected officials aren't going to.) Why does JohnK want to ridicule the accomplishments of generations of great men and women? I blame the stultifying effect of pure, undiluted greed. Of course it's also true that JohnK argues that his crimes are victimless. This is an entertaining statement, perhaps, except that when taken at face value it presages a likely attempt by JohnK to progressively enlarge and increasingly centralize the means of oppression, exploitation, violence, and destruction. Although JohnK's partisans remain a small isolated minority except during times of economic or social stress, when a mass following develops to blame the worst types of stingy gossipmongers there are for the problems besetting society, when you look back over the text of this letter, it should be clear that I have defeated this revolting propagandist with my words. Just imagine what I could have done with my fire-breathing fists.

tl;dr: JohnK's a punk.