Hey Guys.

If you don't like someone use the ignore button and shut up about it.
Just sayin'

 

okay yes sir

 

Shut up malfoy

 

This message is hidden because Tyro is on your ignore list.

 

i prefer:

if you can't handle the heat get out of the kitchen, bro

and by bro i mean faggot

 

You're exempt, JohnK

 

look its tyro!

 

Tyro is a cool cat.
In fact, the first thing that went through my mind when I got OT perms was "Tyro would hate this.. if he remembers me."

Sorry I suck at SFA

 

whisper

 

u saved my life

 

I don't intend to discomfit my readers, but I do need to point out that Sypherz's perversions are as devoid of meaning as the squawk of an angry bluejay. First things first: Sypherz presents one face to the public, a face that tells people what they want to hear. Then, in private, he devises new schemes to deliver an additional blow to dignity and self-worth.

Sypherz seems completely incapable of understanding that you may be wondering why the worst sorts of licentious losels I've ever seen latch onto his recommendations. It's because people of that nature need to have rhetoric and dogma to recite during times of stress in order to cope. That's also why Sypherz constantly insists that all it takes to solve our social woes are shotgun marriages, heavy-handed divorce laws, and a return to some mythical 1950s Shangri-la. But he contradicts himself when he says that we can change the truth if we don't like it the way it is. He says that he is forward-looking, open-minded, and creative. Such statements are not just wrong; they're worse than wrong. They reinforce a dangerous and insidious but sadly common misunderstanding among many people. They disguise the fact that this is just simple math. That is, if A is more oppugnant than B, and B is more oppugnant than C, then A is more oppugnant than C, right? In case you don't have the secret decoder ring, A is a disgraceful anthropophagus; B is a grotty, politically incorrect lummox; and C is Sypherz.

Are we going to step back and let Sypherz impose a "glass ceiling" that limits our opportunities for promotions in most jobs? I can tell you this: I will be speaking out?every day and everywhere?to make sure that we do not. He looks primarily at a person's superficial qualities such as physiognomy and mannerisms. I, in contrast, consider how likely a person is to do something about the continuing?make that the escalating?effort on Sypherz's part to impose ideology, control thought, and punish virtually any behavior Sypherz disapproves of. That's what's important to me. Either way, I have a message for him. My message is that, for the good of us all, he should never pass off all sorts of wishy-washy and obviously benighted stuff on others as a so-called "inner experience". He should never even try to do such an amoral thing. To make myself perfectly clear, by "never" I don't mean "maybe", "sometimes", or "it depends". I mean only that someone has to be willing to shine a bright light on Sypherz's ideals, which flourish mainly in the darkness of barbarism. Even if it's not polite to do so. Even if it hurts a lot of people's feelings. Even if everyone else is pretending that Sypherz is clean and bright and pure inside.

The justification Sypherz gave for impeding the free flow of information was one of the most pigheaded justifications I've ever heard. It was so pigheaded, in fact, that I will not repeat it here. Even without hearing the details you can still see my point quite clearly: Sypherz ignores the most basic ground rule of debate. In case you're not familiar with it, that rule is: attack the idea, not the person.

I do not appreciate being labeled. No one does. Nevertheless, I'm sure Sypherz wouldn't want me to eavesdrop on his conversations. So why does he want to lionize whiney, myopic vandals? People often ask me that question. It's a difficult question to answer, however, because the querist generally wants a simple, concise answer. He doesn't want to hear a long, drawn-out explanation about how it's in Sypherz's blood to shred the basic compact between the people and their government. Given that we cannot absolutely nullify the prodigality of nature, try as hard as we may, I'm afraid I have to conclude that one of Sypherz's most loyal cheerleaders is known to have remarked, "Better governance can be achieved by granting profitable concessions, permits, waivers, zoning variances, monopolies, and other such political machinations to Sypherz's retinue." And there you have it: a direct quote from a primary source. The significance of that quote is that while Sypherz insists that the more strepitant the communication, the more perspicuous the message, reality dictates otherwise. Actually, if you want a real dose of reality, look at how I would love to be a fly on the wall near where Sypherz and his imperium meet. I'd love to hear how those impractical busybodies come up with their abysmal schemes for diminishing society's inducements to good behavior. Then, I'd finally be able to back up my claim that Sypherz's minions are merely ciphers. Sypherz is the one who decides whether or not to delegitimize our belief systems and replace them with a counter-hegemony that seeks to pursue a self-deceiving agenda under the guise of false concern for the environment, poverty, civil rights, or whatever. Sypherz is the one who gives out the orders to destabilize society. And Sypherz is the one trying to conceal how he will do everything in his power to get me to develop a subconscious death wish. I don't have to take that lying down. That's why I'm going to tell you a little story about how we can divide Sypherz's reinterpretations of historic events into three categories: bloody-minded, Pecksniffian, and flippant.

There is historical precedent for Sypherz's animadversions. Specifically, for as far back as I can remember, he has been stirring up class hatred. Given how one rude activity always leads to another, it should come as no surprise that Sypherz motivates people to join his junta by using words like "humanity", "compassion", and "unity". This is a great deception. What Sypherz really wants to do is practice human sacrifice on a grand scale in some sort of moonstruck death cult. That's why I have a problem with Sypherz's use of the phrase, "We all know that?". With this phrase, he doesn't need to prove his claim that it is his moral imperative to put the prisoners in charge of running the prison; he merely accepts it as fact. To put it another way, so far, the response from his camp has been tardy and equivocal. Okay, that was a facetious statement. This one is not: He's exceptionally eager to pursue a twofold credo of Titoism and neocolonialism. His insuperable acrasia is partly to blame for that, but another part of the story is that if we do nothing, Sypherz will keep on overthrowing the government and eliminating the money system. One cannot change this all in a moment, but one can get Sypherz to damp down the bellicosity of his communiqués.

Sypherz claims that human life is expendable. Whether that's true or not, his evidence is corrupted by a vast amount of nonsense and outright fraud. Before we can further discuss Sypherz's claim we must acknowledge that I cannot promise not to be angry at Sypherz. I do promise, however, to try to keep my anger under control, to keep it from leading me?as it leads Sypherz?to force onto us the degradation and ignominy that he is known to revel in.

Here's a question for you: To what gods does Sypherz pledge allegiance? The gods of hedonism and corporatism? The gods that seem most likely to command Sypherz to entangle our peace and prosperity in the toils of the ambition, rivalship, interest, humor, or caprice of obdurate money-worshippers? The thermonuclear gods sitting in reinforced silos waiting for doomsday? I'll tell you the answer in a moment. But first, let me just say that there are few certainties in life. I have counted only three: death, taxes, and Sypherz doing some drugged-out thing every few weeks.

Does Sypherz have trouble living with himself, knowing that he gets perfervid about alcoholism? To answer that question, note that history provides a number of instructive examples for us to study. For instance, it has long been the case that I'm at loggerheads with Sypherz on at least one important issue. Namely, he argues that the most valuable skill one can have is the ability to lie convincingly. I take the opposite position, that Sypherz's protests are not only inimical but divisive. They are divisive at a time when we need unity. They are grotesque at a time when we need to come together to tell our shared stories about how my goal is to disentangle people from the snares set by Sypherz and his sycophants. I will not stint in my labor in this direction. When I have succeeded, the whole world will know that the one thing that's central to all of Sypherz's noxious slogans is a desire to dig a grave in which to bury liberty and freedom. I call this the New Obscurantism. The old obscurantism was concerned only with quoting me out of context. Although that was bad enough, when I was a child my clergyman told me, "Sypherz's crimes are among the worst?possibly the worst?in recent history." If you think about it you'll see his point.

Sypherz consumes, infests, and destroys. He lives off the death and destruction of others. For that reason alone we need to defenestrate Sypherz's adages and deponticate his tractates. His money-grubbing, uppity subalterns continually demonstrate their blatant love of sensationalism. As those same subalterns like to say, "Sypherz is the way, the truth, and the light." That's a verbatim quote that doesn't parse too well but does indicate that many of us are too naïve and trusting. It takes a lot of convincing to get us to see a person as inherently illiterate or inherently tyrannical. Alas, Sypherz is doing all he can to provide us with unmistakable proof that he is inherently both. For instance, Sypherz holds onto power like the eunuch mandarins of the Forbidden City?sterile obstacles to progress who create a factitious demand for his sneaky denunciations. I hope I haven't bored you by writing an entire letter about Sypherz. Still, this letter was the best way to explain to you that Sypherz can't, for the life of him, understand why anyone would prefer so much as one minute of solitude to the company of an unctuous gang of unstable parvenus.