Good eye mate... good eye... :nuts:

 

I personally feel that this is a misunderstanding. It seems to me like lawliett edited the post after he posted it as a vouch. If you look, he edited the post 2 hours after he actually posted it. In furious feet's defense, I believe originally the vouch actually say "this guy". I believe furious feet may have mistakenly thought the post was for him, not KMJT. I support a admin or mod looking into this, and seeing if lawliett's original post actually said "this guy" and not KMJT.

This is just my personal opinion

 

i changed it because furious feet used that initial quote to use as a vouch for himself (not what i intended). as you can see from my original quote, i quoted kmjt for the 500M purchase via WU (and was referring to him) when i said "this guy." (check my Vouch Page in my sig for the first transaction with KMJT.) i thought i cleared it up when i changed it to "KMJT" because i saw that furious used it in his vouch page. you must have interpreted it wrong. I have only bought 30M from furious feet, no more. although he is banned, i think furious must have thought that my vouch was for him.

*additionally i only have one vouch from furious feet in my vouch thread which is for the 30m transaction.

exactly, sir. thank you for catching this and understanding the proper text.

 

I understand, which brings me to my next point of why he would take credit for a 500M trade via WU when he blatantly knows he did not do such a trade saying "ty, anything helps"i'm no mod i just didn't want to see someone get scammed.

He will post a dispute i am sure,

 

thank you for understanding. however, do you know why he got banned? haven't heard of anything

 

The vouching was the reason.

But in a sense, he did also take credit for a 500m trade that he was not involved in. I don't want to spam on the thread since he is banned i don't want to get infracted. I understand where you are coming from, but i think he would need to give his explanation in the appeals.

 

what the hell. ?