Another Dispute

Discussion in 'Dispute Forum Archive' started by *Codeh, Dec 18, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Another Dispute
  1. Unread #1 - Dec 18, 2011 at 10:47 PM
  2. *Codeh
    Referrals:
    0

    *Codeh Guest

    Another Dispute

    I'm Codeh, aka Super Mod Wtfpwnt from PB, just wondering why Firez denied and archived my last ban appeal without even reading what I said.

    I was banned for supposedly saying that I was going to file a fake report on a scammer to have them banned. I clearly stated in my last few ignored appeals that either the scammer faked the evidence or that someone managed to get into my MSN. Doesn't really matter since I never did it, but that was in 2007 anyway.

    Firez stated in my last appeal something to the effect of "pay back scammed users".... Which I have no idea what that means or what it has to do with my appeal. I've never scammed anyone before nor has there ever been a filed dispute against me.

    Maybe he just doesn't know how to read? If that's the case, I'd like someone else to review this. I posted a screenshot in my last appeal of my appeal from 2007 explaining the case, but since that tends to get overlooked by people like Firez, I'm not going to post it again. The thread is still there, ignored, from 2007.

    Anyway, unban me now. I've broken no rules. I'd say "I look forward to a speedy reply", but it took about a month last time for someone to read my appeal and respond.
     
  3. Unread #2 - Dec 21, 2011 at 1:00 PM
  4. Snow Patrol
    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Posts:
    6,538
    Referrals:
    7
    Sythe Gold:
    18

    Snow Patrol Emeritus

    Another Dispute

    If your MSN is compromised, you're held responsible for any and all scams committed by the hacker.

    Pay back whatever was scammed to the respective users, and create another dispute with solid proof once you've done so.

    Until then, denied.
     
< I was banned incorrectly | Vaio's Banned? [SIN666] >

Users viewing this thread
1 guest
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.


 
 
Adblock breaks this site