Universe Creation

All begun with the BigBang, at least that's what teachers teach us, well cience is always changing and wrong all the time, we see an example like 200 years ago, the cience is not the same of course, but following my thought, well if all begun with big bag, everything started with it, time started with bigbag, if times begun with it, how can exist god? He would need time to creat the all Universe, other thing is that matter begun with the bigbang to, so that proves that god never existed before, because he needed to be created first, if there is no matter, but then we think, how Math exist, that would need to be a huge mind to create math i think, or i'am wrong? Not saying god, but a superior mind, a superior be, that can exist right? i mean the Age of the Universe is Huge, so that might exist a superior mind, now the BigBang, the all matter that exist on the Universe, Where it came from?

Final Question that is Hard to answer: Where did the all matter and energy came from? Because the matter and energy on BigBang couldn't just appear like: "Puff, there it is, matter and energy", just appear like that? Yeah, we ask how the Begun the Universe? BigBang of course, but now before the big bang if nothing existed the hell the BIGBANG COULD EXIST IF NOTHING EXISTED BEFORE BIGBANG, BIGBANG HAD THE ALL MATTER AND ENERGY, BUT WHERE "HE" GOT THE MATTER AND ENERGY FROM?

This really interesting to talk guys, leave your question/explanion/theory

 

All of the teachers I had used to lean towards god creating the earth (Not everyone is christian you know!) That kind of got me annoyed. I don't really know how the technical terms behind the BIg bang theory but I am a believer in it for sure

 

Same, seems the better explanation for sure.

 

http://ssscott.tripod.com/bang.jpg

Before this, as Malak (SP?) described in the other thread, there was no light, or matter, or time. The laws of physics break down at the point of the big bang and therefore it cannot be theorized what actually happened before hand. We could be just a computer program, or a faux-3D projection of an actual 1D universe. Both are theories of creation and how the universe is.

 

the Big bang is a scientific theory. therefore by it's own definition is the only possibility, and is fact.

 

It is my understanding that the word "theory" is not analogous to the word "proof". You may prove a theory to a certain extent, but in reality a theory is merely an idea backed up by a certain amount of evidence. Newton's theories on gravity and relativity, for example, were completely thrown out the window when Einstein published his theories.

I don't understand your post though, are you trying to justify a theory by saying "everything this theory says is true because it says so"?

 

I'm sorry, I didn't read any of it except the first line. You had me baffled from the start.

You said "Cience" is always changing.

1. Science.

2. Science doesn't change.

The End.

Mod please close.

 

I couldn't understand one thing after the first line . You said "cience" and "BigBag" by which I assume you meant "science" and "Big Bang" . Also , you said "Big Bang" or referred to it so many times , I couldn't stay focused .

 

I'd like to contribute to this topic but unfortunately OP does not know english.