What do you think?

Yes, it's the spam forum, and yes we're going to get stupid comments but,

Do you guys think Inventor's ban was deserved?

He was supposed to be given evidence of the ban, but he never saw/received evidence about the case and was banned instead.

Most of you who've been around know what's went on, and I'd like to know what you guys thought about it.

Was there enough evidence given to Inventor to rule his ban? Would you say what he did was scamming? Thoughts?

 

Yes there was evidence.

 

There was, but Inventor never saw it. Sin just said she'd show him the evidence, but never did.

 

There really was no need to even show him anything, he lied to sin.

 

Plus he tried to cover it up with another banner.

 

It was already proven that he had a joke banner and that the real banner was made first.. Why should lying to Sin while under fierce admin pressure mean that he deserves a ban? He never scammed anything. He just made a joke banner that got taken seriously.

 

That "joke" banner was used to cover it up..

 

How was it used to cover it up when the joke banner was the reason for his ban? It got twisted around into a banner ripped for personal profit .

 

wait wtf did I just post....

nvm that one, it's 12:32 in Cali and I'm sleepy as shit.

What mention was that he made a banner to cover up the "joke" banner.

He also stated that he "messed up" in his farewell.

 

Inventor admitted to lying anyway, theres no need for evidence (indifferent on unbanning or not)

 

^ that up there

 

Also, night night nigs

 

Also, he wasn't even convicted of scamming. He was banned for a month for ripping a banner (a ban that could have potentially been removed), and then perm banned for lying to attempt to cover it up.

 

for an inventor he is kinda dumb

 

well played