unb4nn3d

The following letter is inspired by a quote from Thomas Paine: “He who dares not offend cannot be honest.” With this letter, I hope to make this world a kinder, gentler place. But first, I would like to make the following introductory remark: When I claim that Unb4nn3d is deeply and fundamentally stingy, this is not a commitment to ahistorical, prelinguistic, transcendent facts but a causal account that has explanatory power in connecting up phenomena in the world with the manner in which Unb4nn3d has been passing off all sorts of disorderly and obviously abysmal stuff on others as a so-called “inner experience”. People used to think I was exaggerating whenever I said that his solutions represent an illegitimate, unilateral attempt to leave helpless citizens afraid in the streets, in their jobs, and even in their homes. After seeing Unb4nn3d replace our timeless traditions with his socially inept ones these same people now realize that I wasn't exaggerating at all. In fact, they even realize that I've known some casuists who were impressively barbaric. However, Unb4nn3d is polyloquent-to-the-core and that trumps polyloquent every time.

There is a subtle difference between chastising Unb4nn3d for not doing any research before spouting off and unmasking Unb4nn3d's true face and intentions in regard to hooliganism. The difference lies between the objective potential and the subjective organization needed to realize that potential. In other words, Unb4nn3d says that the majority of querimonious, liberticidal saboteurs work 25 hours a day, eight days a week and thus deserve occasionally to infringe upon our most important constitutional rights. This is at best wrong. At worst, it is a lie.

Unb4nn3d is a jackbooted sook. In fact, Unb4nn3d is worse than a jackbooted sook; he's also a savage blatherskite. That's why he feels obligated to criticize other people's beliefs, fashion sense, and lifestyle. Would we, as thinking people, believe louts who tried to tell us we're all contumacious? I say “no.”

As every grade-school student learns, it's not nice to pollute the great canon of English literature with references to Unb4nn3d's daft polemics. Apparently, Unb4nn3d missed that day in class. Otherwise, he'd know that our real enemies are not people living in a distant land whose names we don't know and whose culture we don't understand. Our real enemies are Unb4nn3d and all others who feed blind hatred. So, what am I doing about that? I'm educating. I'm trying to establish beyond a shred of doubt that remaining silent and inactive in the face of his doctrines negates our duty as civilized members of the community.

Just as when something flies in the direction of your eyes, your eyelids close instantly and of their own accord, so too does Unb4nn3d instinctively and automatically smear and defame me. I am not trying to save the world—I gave up that pursuit a long time ago. But I am trying to eschew stentorian antipluralism. Now there will, no doubt, be unreasonable muttonheads out there who will ask, “So what if his compatriots in etatism shame my name? That won't affect me.” Such crippled thinking is the best example there is as to why his campaigns are an icon for the deterioration of the city, for its slow slide into crime, malaise, and filth. Unb4nn3d's most steadfast claim is that he can convince criminals to fill out an application form before committing a crime. If there were any semblance of truth in this, I would be the last to say anything against it. As it stands, however, for many people, Unb4nn3d's sniveling, bookish hypnopompic insights have caused substantial pain and suffering, mental anguish, emotional distress, post-traumatic stress, sleeplessness, indignities and embarrassment, degradation, injury to reputation, and restrictions on personal freedom. Whew! The only thing they haven't yet caused, surprisingly, is a greater realization that it is easy to see faults in others. But it takes perseverance to rebuild our communities.

Nobody wants Unb4nn3d to weaken our mental and moral fiber, but Unb4nn3d insists on doing it anyway. I hardly need to tell you that he has indicated that if we don't let him form the association in the public's mind between any actions he disagrees with and the ideas of hate and violence and illegality then he'll be forced to trick academics into abandoning the principles of scientific inquiry. That's like putting rabid attack dogs in silk suits. In other words, Unb4nn3d has issued us a thinly veiled threat that's intended primarily to scare us away from the realization that he's surely proud of himself for conconcting such a “brilliant” scheme for engendering ill will. In my opinion, however, that's the worst idea in the long, sad history of bad ideas. Much better would be to exert a positive influence on the type of world that people will live in a thousand years from now.

Never mind that Unb4nn3d likes to put on a honest face to dissimulate his plans to caricature and stereotype people from other cultures. What's really important is that for those of us who make our living trying to create a world in which colonialism, commercialism, and deconstructionism are all but forgotten, it is important to consider that I am a law-and-order kind of person. I hate to see crimes go unpunished. That's why I honestly hope that Unb4nn3d serves a long prison term for his illegal attempts to champion censorship in the name of free speech, intolerance in the name of tolerance, and oppression in the name of freedom. I personally obviously hope that the truth will prevail and that justice will be served before Unb4nn3d does any real damage. Or is it already too late? I wish I had a lot more time to answer that question. Unfortunately, the following comment will have to suffice: I wouldn't put it past Unb4nn3d to transform fear and its inculcation into the preeminent force ruling human existence. As long as I live, I will be shouting this truth from rooftops and doing everything I can to advance freedom in countries strangled by tyranny.

Individually, Unb4nn3d's slurs threaten, degrade, poison, bulldoze, and kill this world of ours. But linked together, Unb4nn3d's objectives could easily wage a clandestine guerilla war against many basic human rights. Although the destructiveness of Unb4nn3d's biases has been chronicled elsewhere in great and tedious detail it fits too neatly into my thesis to overlook. Hence, I shall chronicle it here as well but only as a quick comment that Unb4nn3d will probably respond to this letter just like he responds to all criticism. He will put me down as “namby-pamby” or “heinous”. That's his standard answer to everyone who says or writes anything about him except the most fawning praise. Before you read this letter, you might have thought that Unb4nn3d values our perspectives. Now you know that he can't imagine life without Chekism.

 

Can somebody ban this guy too? Thanks.

 

To respond to all of Loyal to da game's squibs would take up too much room and time. I would like to address the most nasty ones, though. When writing this letter, I had originally intended to segregate the pure errors of fact in Loyal to da game's comments from the assertions of questionable judgment where there could be room for dispute. I eventually decided against that approach because we must stop tiptoeing and begin marching boldly and forthrightly towards our goal, which is to establish clear, justifiable definitions of diabolism and pessimism so that one can defend a decision to take action when Loyal to da game's thralls undermine serious institutional and economic analyses and replace them with a diverting soap opera of sex-crazed conspiracies. Loyal to da game seems to be involved in a number of illegal or borderline-illegal activities. For him and his functionaries, tax evasion and financial chicanery are scarcely outside the norm. Even financial fraud and thievery seem to be okay. What's next? Jawboning aimlessly? I can say only that the long-term consequences of Loyal to da game's diatribes are rarely examined, let alone subjected to scientific scrutiny. The best example of this, culled from many, would have to be the time Loyal to da game tried to regiment the public mind as much as an army regiments the bodies of its soldiers. And that's it. Loyal to da game's efforts to stonewall on issues in which taxpayers see a vital public interest are the reason we have so many problems today with alienation, drug abuse, alcohol abuse, and aimlessness on the part of our young people.

 

*Mooning my fat ass.

 

hi dad

 

hi

 

TLDR :S

 

Agree with this dude.