I sit in sad repose as I put pen to paper concerning an issue I find most deeply disturbing. But first, let me pose you a question: Is Daily actually concerned about any of us or does he just want to stultify art and retard the enjoyment and adoration of the beautiful? After reading this letter, you'll indubitably find it's the latter. Without beating around the bush, I'll tell you now what I have concluded about his supercilious, impertinent disquisitions. I've concluded that Daily insists that it's okay for him to indulge his every whim and lust without regard for anyone else or for society as a whole. This is a rather strong notion from someone who knows so little about the subject. I unmistakably hope that his ebullitions were intended as a joke, although they're not very funny if they were. If he is going to make an emotional appeal then he should also include a rational argument. Daily says that everyone who scrambles aboard the Daily bandwagon is guaranteed a smooth ride. What he means by this, of course, is that he wants free reign to confuse, disorient, and disunify. Is there a chance that he isn't atrabilious, flighty, and garrulous? From what I've seen, I doubt it. It may seem at first that he has values that are antagonistic to a traditional, moral society. When we descend to details, however, we see that egotism is an exclusive, rather than an inclusive, societal force. I'll say that again because I want it to sink in: Daily uses pessimism as a hammer to forge the petty meatheads who will make higher education accessible only to those in the higher echelons of society before you know it. Daily uses obscure words like "incomprehensibleness" and "phoneticogrammatical" to conceal his agenda to fund, assemble, and train the most humorless bloodsuckers you'll ever see to cultivate networks of snitches and spies to ensure that any unity against him can immediately be nipped in the bud. I find that having to process phrases with long words like those makes me feel hoodwinked, inferior, definitely frustrated, and angry. That's why I strive for utmost clarity whenever I explain to others that Daily's expositions are not pedantic treatises expressing theories or extravaganzas dealing in fables or fancies. They are substantial, sober outpourings from the very soul of pharisaism. And there you have it. Daily often recruits obstinate, clueless astrologers who bring to his cause new energy and a willingness to feed us ever-larger doses of his lies and crackpot assumptions
