Most recent Infraction-misunderstanding

The other day I was infracted for ignoring stickies.

I was actually infracted for offering to "varify" someone's guide. It was a bad choice of wording on my part:

This is the thread

http://www.sythe.org/showthread.php?p=5035577#post5035577

He never said how fast they work and $50 is a lot for a RWT method. He also got his first vouch for the guide in a couple minutes which I think is unheard of for the type of information he provided..

Here is the time between posts for his thread and his first vouch..
04-02-2009, 09:11 AM
04-02-2009, 09:13 AM


He posted this:

And I wasn't aware it was even against the rules but I consider myself pretty trusted considering I've been active, have a few vouches, and a decent amount of posts.

So I offered to "varify" it. When I should of said bought it.
There were a lot of sketchy things going on so I said I would buy it if he went first and I would varify or vouch that it worked and shed some light on the people that thought he was scamming..it was just the wrong wording on my part.

Here are some of the red flags that hit me when I entered the thread:

(Refering to his quick 2 minute trade of a $50 guide)

And when I posted I was trying to come across like this:

But I did say "varify" and I apologize for coming off like that. Hopefully you'll understand that I made an honest mistake.

 

It's possible he sold the guide before he even posted the thread and then got the guy to vouch once he did post it. So it's not unheard of. Anyway...

I understand that you made a mistake and I am willing to reverse the infraction (since I gave it). Be more careful next time, ok?

If any mods have anything to say, go ahead.

EDIT: Giddy already reversed it.

 

Reversed.