High Pardons

It's fine the way it is.

 

It doesnt matter if 5 mods or 20 read each pardon, if we aren't denying at a rate of at least 97% then we might as well just delete the forum.

 

It doesn't matter what the rate of denial is, each pardon should be considered seriously.

 

This.

There is no ''right to be pardoned'' - staff members will only extend a pardon to a user in exceptional cases. If a user that the staff deem worthy of a pardon appeals, staff members respond satisfactorily quickly. I do not support the notion that staff should have to respond to each pardon appeal - as FireZ has outlined, if no support is expressed, it is a silent show of no support.

 

Most of the staff do read it but some do not post due to no support. The system is fine at the moment but there is one small flaw. Even if a staff does not support, they should write why they do not support. I have seen many staff members just writing, "no support". With reasoning, it would clarify to the person who is appealing.

I somewhat agree with you. Appeals should be taken seriously, reasoning should be a necessity, not just "No Support".

 

I think a lot of the problem is that too many people are appealing for high pardons that either:
-Aren't eligible
-Aren't serious
-Aren't in the right section... a lot of them are disputes.

I really haven't seen a serious, worthy pardon in awhile.

 

I agree with this, most of them don't even deserve a "Denied".

 

I don't think they should have to specify a reason for showing "no support" as their reasoning is usually the reason for the perm in the first place

 

(Me) - I wish they could of taken my appeal more seriously.. I did not scam or attempt to, but I received the TwC. I don't really care anymore due to many people know I am legit even with this BULLSHIT TwC.

Hopefully, the next time I appeal, it will be taken into more consideration. I support sythe a lot. Posting, reporting, donating.. What else is needed??