Disputing 2 infractions

Discussion in 'Dispute Forum Archive' started by neverfinished, Nov 13, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Disputing 2 infractions
  1. Unread #1 - Nov 13, 2009 at 12:53 AM
  2. neverfinished
    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2009
    Posts:
    1,359
    Referrals:
    4
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    neverfinished Guru

    Disputing 2 infractions

    #1
    flaming
    post has been hidden
    infracted by:Rawr Im Phat

    I posted on a USfine post stating the fact that purchasing from asian based sites puts money into communist china. I did not in anyway whatsoever attack USfine's reputation or business. I was extremely polite and overall unbiased. Infracting me for this was extreme censorship which may be acceptable in communist china however by American standards and every other free country's(pretty much all sythe users) standards this is highly unacceptable. I broke 0 sythe rules as i have read them all thoroughly.


    #2
    spamming
    http://sythe.org/showthread.php?p=5623132#post5623132
    infracted by:Unb4nn3d (Great guy)

    Because i am so trusted on sythe especially in fire caping i got on the account that supposedly had the fire cape to verify it wasnt there. I got on it and i proved it wasnt. however satan found a picture proving he had gotten it which means that stubby lost it,dropped it or has hidden it somehow. I diffused a flame war in this situation and im being infracted because im not proper status to verify fire capes? vouching/verifying for somebody are the same thing so sorry for using a poor word choice but an infraction is absolutely ridiculous. I hope logic will win in this situation.

    thanks for hearing me out
    sincerly, NF
     
  3. Unread #2 - Nov 13, 2009 at 11:09 AM
  4. OldFinn
    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2007
    Posts:
    7,094
    Referrals:
    60
    Sythe Gold:
    1

    OldFinn Hero
    Banned

    Disputing 2 infractions

    Both warranted.
     
< DarkGroove,Giddy?... | My Ban >

Users viewing this thread
1 guest
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.


 
 
Adblock breaks this site