Fake vouches

[damageplan]

Can we get people infractions for posting vouches that don't include 2 sides of a trade? I hear a lot of people complaining about "weak" vouches lately, and I'm wondering if it's cracked down upon?

 

[kill dank]

i sure hope so, fake vouches are almost always a sign of a scammer. and half-ass vouches don't help make people more comfortable

 

[Solved]

Yea some people vouch others they post it in their thread but then it contains like, thank you for bumping my thread or so

 

[Fed]

Fake vouching warrants a ban i believe.

 

[illlliiiiiilllll]

I certainly believe people posting fake vouches should be a bannable offence.

 

[Syed]

Fake vouches are a permanent ban.

 

Posting fake vouches shows a sign of scamming and is a bannable offence. Read the rules.

 

[AreUCertain]

Read the rules like haha said.

 

[Magic Arrow]

Thank you all for proving you did not even read the question.

The answer is:
No, it is not a bannable, as a vouch is not a requirement after a trade. HOWEVER they will ban you if they find any link between the vouching account and your account.

 

[illlliiiiiilllll]

i have my finger in my bum

Is that really a worthy thing to post?

And when you say "weak vouches" are these like for buying/selling things that cost little or no money at all or ones from leechers etc?

 

[Skele]

Can we get people infractions for posting vouches that don't include 2 sides of a trade? I hear a lot of people complaining about "weak" vouches lately, and I'm wondering if it's cracked down upon?

I don't understand what you mean by "weak vouches". Vouch aren't required in trades and any sort of fake vouches are a bannable offence.

 

[Stan²]

Fake vouches are bannable, like someone sais: i'm adding you to msn.
and someone quotes it and changes text to: vouch, went smooth.
thats bannable.

 

[Delfi]

I fully agree, People should be banned for this offense.

 

[The_Ohner]

I fully agree, People should be banned for this offense.

They already are to my knowledge.
A bit more attention to detail and a lot more would be gone.

 

I don't understand what you mean by "weak vouches". Vouch aren't required in trades and any sort of fake vouches are a bannable offence.

I think he means like pin trades, 1-5 skill training, Tut island vouches, etc.

 

[ck Muncher]

Im not 100% sure what you mean by fake, but I think you're hinting at
people making multiple accounts and just getting post counts up and then pretending at trade.

I know my two current vouches seems a little bit 'fake', but I can assure you the trades were legit.

 

[Nitrousek]

I think he means like pin trades, 1-5 skill training, Tut island vouches, etc.

I thought exactly the same thing.

1-5 Skill training, should it be even vouchable? it takes less than 5 minutes for every skill, people will get like 10 of them legitly which would took like 1 hour or less, and then they're acting like trusted.

 

[SuF]

I thought exactly the same thing.

1-5 Skill training, should it be even vouchable? it takes less than 5 minutes for every skill, people will get like 10 of them legitly which would took like 1 hour or less, and then they're acting like trusted.

It would be much too hard to make a line for what you can vouch for and what you can't. Its just not worth it and makes vouches more controlled which we really do not want.

 

[henghuishen]

Its a grey area..But i always check out vouches thoroughly .