Forgiveness? Unbanned. (Self Vouching) "Appreciate for Sythe personally to decide"

PLEASE, I AM REQUESTING ONLY SYTHE HIMSELF TO LOOK AT THIS RESPECTABLY SO I WOULD APPRECIATE IT FOR IT TO STAY OPEN AND HANDLED ONLY BY HIM; YOUR MORE THAN WELCOME TO POST YOUR COMMENTS AND SUPPORTING THOUGH

Ok... I know it's been well over a month, as stated in your rules if their still the same, a month after a ban would be totally disregarded which is understandable, as seeing if an individual was really that intent on wanting to be unbanned, they would have made it as soon as possible unless a situation was announced that left it impossible.

Now, I did try my hardest to be unbanned when I was banned, as-well my cousin was banned along with me for the same reason, as he's the one that had vouched me. I was banned because it was stated that I had not publicly announced Cloudsword as my cousin, therefore the vouches he had gave me was considered " Fake vouching; Self Vouching ", yet I had showed evidence that Cloudsword was publicly announced by me he was my cousin, but for some odd reason after it was shown it was deleted. (I am not going to say who deleted it, but it was deleted, and I don't know of the reason)

The link that proved I announced Cloudsword as my cousin was:
http://www.sythe.org/showpost.php?p=6116353&postcount=2

Shown in that post, R33l2r3al showed the thread evidence showing I had publicly announced him as my cousin, but considering that was deleted my someone, I had recently found this:
http://gnu.sythe.org/showthread.php?t=551335

That was my training services, as when I was trying to get everything possible under my belt for experience, at the bottom of that thread my edit reason being " Adding my Cousin ", and as shown in the thread 'Cloudsword' was added, ad stating him to have been my cousin.

Every bit of everything against me, was proven otherwise by me and a few mods/exmods to prove my ban should have not been warranted, but after countless evidence and everything, my threads even prior to the decision was continuously archived, deleted and hidden, as R33l2r3al stated and shown, he would not tell me who was doing it, but it was being done, as if the individual doing it did not want it to be shown I should be unbanned.

I also noticed the 'Self Vouching' was bumped to only being 3months, I will be fine with waiting 3months for me to be unbanned, or so even being unbanned when this is approved considering there was countless evidence that Cloudsword was publicly announced my cousin, and now only proof I have is that link I have shown above of the editing of the thread.

Reason why I should be unbanned? I don't know, that's for you to decide, I know for myself I did do a great deal of keeping the forums cleans, tracking down scammers and individuals doing wrong, and personally taking care of most of the entire RaS section, helping people always giving services, was a great part of the community.

Also, support for my unban from moderators: [X][X]

IF ANY OTHER REQUIREMENTS ARE NEEDED, PLEASE STATE IN THE THREAD, AND IT WILL BE GOTTEN AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.

Thank you.

 

Whether Tengauge's ban is legitimate I cannot state; however, I request that anyone viewing treat the dispute without bias or disrespect.

 

http://sythe.org/member.php?u=124518

 

Person is willing to prove they're not the same person as john on cam today.

 

I've never actually understood this? Give me a few minutes and I'll round up a dozen people that will claim on CNN they're not me either.

 

I hold true to Sin's judgement and thus do not support an unban.

 

I understand that. Ultimately, it's up to the staff to determine whether he's lying or not.

 

Also, Tengauge requested this be posted, as it proves cloudsword and tengauge12 both acknowledged each other as cousins more than a year before their banning: http://gnu.sythe.org/showthread.php?t=553396

 

Misunderstood the situation. I will stay neutral.

 

A decision hasn't exactly gone through yet, what are we all thinking here?

 

Agreed.

 

Isn't 'self vouching' a 3 month ban anyways..? He's served his 3 months, regardless of if he's guilty or not.

 

I'm actually archiving this on the grounds that it has been disputed before. You all claim that you respect Sin's decision-making and thoroughness yet try to overturn her bans left, right and centre. The ban will remain.