sorry that i was confused. but here is proof

idk if this helps my cause or not bc 2 mods have told me that "i am responsible for my ip" ughh ok but i have been talking to a few mods/exmods on msn and im doing this by their general recommendation.
below are screen shots of me and my accused fellow criminal talking on msn, hopefully this will be enough to over come the whole "responsible for your ip" explanation. i have been accused of self vouching. i can assure you that this did not happen. and will provid any further material that any mod wishes to see or hear or be explained.





although these are only our conversations they should prove that we are 2 different people, if that is what this is truly about then the ban should be lifted. if this is about me letting him use my laptop to log onto sythe then i guess i am guilty but would like to say that i did not know that was against the rules and will swear to you that i will read over the rules section again 3 times to make sure i know them all and never break one again. i am sorry if this was something negative that i did to hurt sythe or the sythe community at all as i would never want for that to happen.

im still a little confused by this bc i still havent gotten an explanation but now you know that we are 2 seperate humans and that i am sorry for letting him use my laptop. also he has agreed to help me further prove that i did not vouch for myself if need be. please tell me what else i must do to prove this to you and it will be done. thank you to every single mod out there.

if you didnt know i was accused of vouching for myself bc the post came from my ip adress. this is fully explained in the above text and photos. I did not nor will ever vouch for myself or knowingly break any rule whatsoever.

 

So what you're saying is that over a period of one month, this person only accessed Sythe from your home? Seems far-fetched to me.